Wood clearly has a positive tone throughout her piece. She mentions how social networking facilitates intellectual engagement (much like how our class utilizes this blog!) and allows interactive discussion of ideas. These important components of communication are useful as long as a person knows how to effectively operate the social networking sites. I particularly enjoyed the emphasis on this aspect of social networking because Wood was able to counter argue Tang's criticisms by simply stating that it can be wonderful when used correctly.
I definitely agree with your points! A reader might certainly view Tang's argument as the one for social networking sites without considering her negative views because she does mention aspects of those sites that can be highly beneficial - easiness and quickness of free exchange of ideas between people. Also, I agree thatacknowledging the need for using the social networks correctly makes Wood's argument more convincing.
ReplyDeleteIt's kinda eery how similar the concept of "being constantly plugged in" to social networks to that of being plugged in to the Matrix. Is social networking an extension of our own real life Matrix? Facebook is its own virtual world in which millions are "plugged in." In relation to Wei Tang's argument, perhaps Facebook is a world of itself that masks us from operating efficiently in the real world. Just something to think about...
ReplyDeleteI think your point about Tang's argument is an interesting one. It is true that the evidence she uses to support her anti-social-networking argument contains many points that are pros for supporters of these kinds of sites. Most people today are all about instant gratification and broad connections, which is just what sites like Facebook can offer. However, Tang claims that these points negatively affect students. This dissonance that is created as a result of Tang's choice of evidence makes her argument weak.
ReplyDeleteVery good discussion. Eloquently stated as well. You find specific comparisons and describe them fully. I agree with your statements, but also with the majority of the comments above as well.
ReplyDelete