In the article "Do Problems Associated with Social Networking Outweigh the Benefits?", two authors argue contrasting views of popular social networking sites on the Internet. Norah Wei Tang states that social networking sites are harmful in that they create a huge distriction and serious time management issues. On the other hand, Elizabeth Anne Wood argues that social networking sites are beneficial because they faciliate intellectual engagement by encouraging free exchange of ideas.
Despite theses differences, the two authors have a common assumption; they both agree that social networking sites have become a huge part of students' lives. Tang specifically mentions the high frequency of college students using these networking sites by stating that "As long as users have access to the Internet, they can be plugged in 24/7." Similarly, Wood also assumes that social networking sites are popular among the college students. Her arguement about social networking being a place for intellectual interactions assumes that students spend a significant amount of time on the networking sites and that they are familiar with using them.
I agree that facebook and other sites have become a huge part of students lives, but I think both of these authors are missing a very key piece of the picture. Not all students use the sites in the wrong way. Like you said, they assume students live on these sites. That is not the case for many many students.
ReplyDeleteI completely agree with your analysis of the arguments. And in my opinion, both of the authors make sound arguments. Social networking sites are often a waste of time, but at the same time they can be very valuable. In my opinion, however, the ease with which users can exchange ideas is more valuable than the wasted time they cause is harmful. I find social networking sites to be beneficial overall.
ReplyDelete